Muscular Endurance Training: Evidence-Based Strategies for Strength and Performance
Discover evidence-based strategies for building muscular endurance, improving strength adaptations, and enhancing athletic performance
EXERCISE
Dr. T.S. Didwal, M.D.(Internal Medicine)
5/15/202616 min read
For years, fitness culture forced people to choose sides. You were either the “cardio person” chasing endurance and heart health, or the “strength person” focused on muscle, power, and resistance training. Runners often feared the weight room would make them bulky and slow, while lifters worried endurance exercise would “kill gains.” But modern exercise science is now dismantling this outdated divide. The newest research reveals that strength and endurance are not competing systems inside the body — they are deeply interconnected biological partners that work together to improve metabolic health, fatigue resistance, athletic performance, and healthy aging (Ramos-Campo et al., 2025).
Scientists now understand that combining resistance training with aerobic conditioning can improve running economy, muscular endurance, mitochondrial efficiency, neuromuscular coordination, and even long-term joint resilience (Zhang et al., 2025). In practical terms, this means that the runner who adds functional strength training may finish races stronger and experience fewer injuries, while the gym athlete who develops cardiovascular fitness may recover faster between sets and sustain higher training quality over time. The human body was never designed for isolated fitness qualities — it thrives on integration.
This emerging field, often called concurrent training, is becoming one of the most important concepts in modern sports medicine and exercise physiology. Researchers are also discovering that recovery strategies such as deload weeks, training sequence optimization, and functional resistance exercises can dramatically influence fatigue management, muscle performance, and endurance adaptations (Feng et al., 2026). Even the nervous system plays a central role, influencing how efficiently muscles resist fatigue during prolonged exercise (Nuzzo et al., 2026).
The message from modern physiology is becoming unmistakable: the future of fitness is not choosing between strength and endurance. It is learning how to train both intelligently to build a body that is stronger, more resilient, metabolically healthier, and capable of performing well for decades.
What Is Muscular Endurance, Really?
Before diving into the research, a quick clarification matters. Muscular endurance is not simply "doing lots of reps." More precisely, it is the ability of a muscle or muscle group to sustain repeated contractions against a load over time without a significant drop in force output.
Within that definition, there are two distinct types — and confusing them leads to poor programming:
Absolute muscular endurance: How many repetitions can you complete at a fixed external load (e.g., 20 repetitions with a 40 kg barbell).
Relative muscular endurance: How many repetitions you can complete at a percentage of your current maximum (e.g., 15 repetitions at 70% of your 1-rep max).
This distinction, explored in depth by Hammert et al. (2025) in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, turns out to be the source of enormous confusion in gyms worldwide. Their comprehensive literature review found that resistance training reliably and consistently improves absolute muscular endurance — people can do far more reps with the same weight after a training block. However, relative muscular endurance often stays flat or even decreases slightly, because strength gains tend to outpace local metabolic and fatigue-resistance adaptations (Hammert et al., 2025).
What this means for you: If you've been adding weight to the bar every week and measuring your "endurance" by how you feel at a fixed, lighter weight, you're not measuring the full picture. True muscular endurance programming requires deliberate high-repetition blocks (15–30 reps at 50–70% of 1RM), not just progressive overload.
The Engine Size Principle: Why Muscle Mass Protects Endurance
Here is a finding that challenges the endurance community's long-standing wariness of the weight room: more functional muscle mass makes you a more fatigue-resistant athlete.
A systematic review and meta-analysis by Zhang et al. (2025), published in Sports Medicine, examined the relationship between lean muscle mass and endurance performance across multiple sports and populations. The results were striking. Endurance athletes with greater lean muscle mass, particularly in the posterior chain, core, and stabilizer muscles, demonstrated:
Superior resistance to neuromuscular fatigue in the final stages of competition
Better metabolic flexibility — the ability to efficiently utilise both carbohydrate and fat for fuel
Higher power output during late-race surges and sprint finishes
Reduced injury rates due to improved joint stability and load tolerance
The mechanism is intuitive once explained. A larger muscle has a larger pool of motor units. As one motor unit fatigues during sustained effort, the central nervous system can rotate "fresher" units into action — essentially spreading the workload across more tissue. Think of it like having ten workers to dig a trench instead of four. The job gets done faster, and each worker tires more slowly (Zhang et al., 2025).
This does not mean endurance athletes should aspire to look like competitive bodybuilders. Research suggests that 1–2% additional lean mass in the legs and core, compared to a strength-untrained baseline, provides the neuromuscular fatigue benefits without meaningfully compromising power-to-weight ratios. Strategic resistance training — not mass building — is the operative phrase.
Does Training One Limb Improve the Other? The Cross-Education Effect
One of the most clinically fascinating areas in exercise science is the concept of cross-education: the measurable improvement in an untrained limb that results from training the opposite limb. This is not a myth. It has been well-established for muscular strength. But does it apply to muscular endurance?
A scoping review by Song et al. (2024), published in Sports Medicine, examined this precise question. Their synthesis of the available literature found preliminary but promising evidence that cross-education effects can transfer muscular endurance adaptations from the trained to the untrained contralateral limb — likely through neural pathways involving enhanced motor cortex excitability and interhemispheric communication via the corpus callosum.
The practical implication is profound, particularly for injured athletes. If you have a stress fracture in the left leg, continuing to train the right leg's muscular endurance may partially preserve fitness in the recovering limb through these neural spillover effects. Rehabilitation professionals may soon incorporate unilateral high-repetition training protocols as a standard injury management tool — not just for strength maintenance, but specifically for endurance capacity preservation (Song et al., 2024).
Functional Training Beats Generic Training for Sport-Specific Endurance
Not all resistance training is created equal. A study by Gürkan et al. (2025), published in Frontiers in Physiology, compared the adaptations of elite young field hockey players undergoing functional resistance training versus traditional machine-based protocols.
Functional resistance training is characterised by multi-planar, compound movements that closely replicate the mechanical and stability demands of a specific sport — think Bulgarian split squats and lateral band walks rather than leg press machines. The results showed significantly superior improvements in both muscular strength and muscular endurance in the functional training group, with effects that transferred directly to game-relevant performance metrics.
Why does this matter beyond field hockey? Because the principle — train movements, not just muscles — is universal. A cyclist who does only seated leg extensions will develop quad strength that does not translate cleanly to pedalling mechanics. A tennis player who uses only sagittal-plane resistance exercises will build strength that doesn't show up during lateral lunges on the court.
Practical rule: At least half of your resistance training volume should consist of exercises that replicate the directional demands, load patterns, and stability challenges of your primary sport or activity (Gürkan et al., 2025).
The Case for Concurrent Training — and How to Sequence It
For years, the "interference effect" stood as the main argument against combining endurance and strength training. The theory held that chronic concurrent training — doing both in the same programme — would blunt adaptations in one or both domains. An umbrella review by Ramos-Campo et al. (2025) in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research has significantly weakened that argument.
Their meta-analysis of systematic reviews covering middle- and long-distance runners, cyclists, and triathletes found that strategically integrated moderate-intensity resistance training (60–75% of 1RM, 10–15 repetitions, 2–3 sessions per week) consistently improved multiple endurance performance determinants, including running economy, lactate threshold, VO₂ max, and late-race neuromuscular power — without compromising aerobic adaptations (Ramos-Campo et al., 2025).
The key qualifier is sequencing. A semi-systematic review by Feng, Ying, and Jun (2026), published in Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, examined how the order of strength and endurance sessions within the same day or training week affects outcomes. Their findings support the following evidence-based sequencing hierarchy:
Strength before endurance (on the same day) produced superior strength adaptations, with manageable effects on endurance quality.
Endurance before strength tended to compromise strength output significantly, as pre-fatigued muscles cannot generate maximum force.
Sessions on separate days produced the best overall concurrent adaptations when recovery was adequate.
A minimum of 6 hours between sessions on the same day partially mitigated interference effects.
The takeaway: the interference effect is largely a sequencing and recovery problem, not a fundamental physiological incompatibility. Structure your week intelligently, and strength training becomes an endurance athlete's competitive advantage — not a liability (Feng et al., 2026).
The Underrated Role of Deloads in Building Endurance
Most athletes understand deloads in the context of strength training — a planned reduction in volume or intensity to allow full recovery before the next progression block. But a 2026 study by Pancar, Ilhan, Darendeli et al., published in Scientific Reports, extended this concept specifically to strength endurance outcomes.
Using a randomised within-subject design with untrained young men, the researchers examined how planned deload periods affected both muscle hypertrophy and strength endurance over a resistance training cycle. The results were clear: participants who incorporated structured deload weeks showed significantly greater strength endurance improvements than those who trained continuously without programmed rest, even though both groups accumulated similar total volume over the study period.
The mechanism appears to relate to supercompensation — the well-documented phenomenon whereby the body, given adequate recovery, overadapts beyond its previous baseline. Deloads also improved neuromuscular readiness, meaning that high-repetition sets performed after a deload week produced better motor unit recruitment and less early fatigue (Pancar et al., 2026).
Practical application: For muscular endurance goals, incorporate a deload week (reduce volume by 40–50%, maintain intensity) every 4–6 weeks. This is not laziness — it is biology working in your favour.
When the Body Cannot Recover: Lessons from ME/CFS Research
No discussion of muscular endurance and fatigue resistance is complete without acknowledging what happens when the recovery system itself breaks down. An important overview by Nuzzo, Taylor, and Latella (2026), published in Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behaviour, examined muscle strength, muscular endurance, voluntary activation, and perceived effort in individuals with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).
Their findings are sobering and instructive for healthy athletes alike. Individuals with ME/CFS demonstrated not only reduced maximal strength and muscular endurance compared to controls, but also significantly impaired voluntary activation — the central nervous system's ability to fully recruit available motor units. Critically, perceived effort was disproportionately elevated: the same absolute workload felt dramatically harder, compromising motivation and training consistency.
This research matters beyond the clinical population for two reasons. First, it underscores that muscular endurance is not just a peripheral muscle quality — it is centrally regulated. The brain's willingness and ability to recruit motor units is as important as the muscle fibres themselves. Second, it reinforces the importance of managing systemic fatigue load in healthy training populations. Overtraining syndrome shares several overlapping features with ME/CFS, including suppressed voluntary activation and elevated perceived exertion (Nuzzo et al., 2026).
If your training leaves you consistently exhausted, with efforts feeling harder than the numbers suggest they should, the problem may not be insufficient fitness — it may be an overloaded nervous system signalling the need for recovery.
Practical Applications: Evidence-Based Programming by Goal
For Endurance Athletes (Runners, Cyclists, Swimmers, Triathletes)
Add 2–3 resistance training sessions per week targeting legs, glutes, and core
Use moderate loads: 60–75% of 1RM, 10–15 repetitions per set
Sequence strength before endurance on the same-day training sessions, or separate by at least 6 hours
Deload every 4–6 weeks: cut volume by 40–50%, maintain intensity
Focus on posterior chain and stability muscles: Romanian deadlifts, single-leg squats, glute bridges, cable pull-throughs
Measure both absolute and relative muscular endurance separately across training blocks
For Strength and Power Athletes
Include 2–3-week muscular endurance blocks (50–70% of 1RM, 15–25 reps) within annual periodisation
Monitor relative muscular endurance as a separate performance metric during hypertrophy phases
Use functional movements that replicate the directional demands of your sport
Incorporate deload weeks every 4–6 weeks to allow supercompensation and prevent central fatigue accumulation
For Team Sport and Functional Athletes (Football, Hockey, Basketball, CrossFit)
Prioritise functional resistance training: multi-planar, compound, stability-demanding movements
Aim for 8–15 repetitions at moderate loads to develop simultaneous strength and endurance
Rotate between strength-emphasis and endurance-emphasis mesocycles across the competitive season
Consider unilateral training as primary modality to leverage cross-education effects and reduce bilateral injury risk
For Injury Rehabilitation
Continue training the uninjured contralateral limb with high-repetition resistance work during recovery periods
Incorporate isometric endurance holds on the injured limb within pain-free range as early as possible
Programme deload-style reduced loads during active rehabilitation phases to prevent central nervous system overload
Monitor perceived exertion closely — disproportionate effort perception is a clinical signal requiring reassessment
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: I've been lifting weights for a year. Why does my running still feel hard? Resistance training improves absolute muscular endurance (how you perform against a fixed external load), but this does not automatically translate to running performance. To improve running economy, your resistance training needs to include posterior chain work — particularly single-leg exercises — at moderate loads and higher repetitions, ideally combined with plyometric work to improve musculotendinous stiffness and elastic energy return (Ramos-Campo et al., 2025).
Q2: Will adding a strength programme make me heavier and slower? Not if programmed correctly. The goal for endurance athletes is not hypertrophy — it is functional strength and neuromuscular quality. Moderate-load, higher-repetition training (60–75% 1RM, 10–15 reps) produces minimal mass gain while significantly improving fatigue resistance, running economy, and late-race power output. Research consistently shows that this approach improves endurance performance determinants without compromising power-to-weight ratios (Zhang et al., 2025).
Q3: How often should I deload, and will it set back my fitness? A structured deload every 4–6 weeks (reducing volume by 40–50% while maintaining intensity) will not reduce your fitness — it will enhance it. Pancar et al. (2026) demonstrated that untrained individuals who incorporated deload periods showed greater strength endurance improvements than those who trained continuously. The deload allows supercompensation: a biological overadaptation that carries you to a higher performance baseline.
Q4: I injured my right knee. Should I stop all lower-body training? Not necessarily. Evidence from Song et al. (2024) supports continuing resistance training on the uninjured left leg during recovery. Cross-education effects — mediated by neural adaptations in the motor cortex and corpus callosum — may partially preserve muscular endurance in the injured limb even without direct loading. Consult your physiotherapist about unilateral training protocols as part of your rehabilitation plan.
Q5: What is the best order to do strength and cardio in the same session? Strength before cardio. Feng, Ying, and Jun (2026) found that performing resistance training before endurance work produced superior strength adaptations with acceptable impact on endurance quality. Performing cardio first significantly reduced the force output available for strength training. Where possible, separate sessions by at least 6 hours — or place them on different days entirely for optimal adaptation in both domains.
Q6: I always feel exhausted even at moderate training loads. What's happening? Persistent, disproportionate fatigue at moderate workloads is a signal worth taking seriously. Research by Nuzzo, Taylor, and Latella (2026) highlights that central nervous system impairment — reduced voluntary motor unit activation — can make the same absolute workload feel significantly harder. This pattern, seen in ME/CFS, also characterises overtraining syndrome in healthy athletes. A structured deload, sleep audit, and professional medical evaluation are warranted if this persists beyond 2–3 weeks.
Q7: How long before I see improvements in muscular endurance from a new training programme? Neurological adaptations — including improved motor unit recruitment and coordination — begin within 2–4 weeks of consistent training, even before visible changes in muscle size or strength. Measurable improvements in absolute muscular endurance (repetitions at a fixed load) typically appear within 4–8 weeks. Relative muscular endurance improvements, requiring more specific high-repetition programming, generally emerge over an 8–12-week focused block (Hammert et al., 2025).
Clinical pearls
1 The Paradox of Strength and Repetitions
Scientific Perspective: Resistance training significantly increases absolute muscular endurance (repetitions at a fixed external load) via hypertrophic and neural adaptations. However, relative muscular endurance (repetitions at a specific % of 1RM) often remains stagnant or decreases, as the rate of maximal strength gain typically outpaces the rate of local metabolic adaptation.
Just because you can bench press 100 lbs for more reps than before doesn't mean your "stamina" has improved across the board. Since you got much stronger, 100 lbs is now a smaller percentage of your max. To truly improve your "gas tank" at higher intensities, you need to specifically practice high-rep sets (15–20+) rather than just chasing heavy weights.
2. The "Shield" of Muscle Mass
Scientific Perspective: Increased lean muscle mass serves as a reservoir for neuromuscular fatigue resistance. By increasing the available motor unit pool, the central nervous system can rotate "fresh" motor units into use as others fatigue (motor unit rotation), preserving power output and metabolic efficiency during prolonged submaximal efforts.
Think of muscle like the engine size in a car. A bigger engine doesn't have to work as hard to maintain 60 mph as a tiny engine does. By building a bit more muscle in your legs and core, you create a "backup system" that kicks in during the last mile of a race when your primary muscles start to give out.
3. Cross-Education and Symmetry
Scientific Perspective: Unilateral resistance training may induce bilateral adaptations in muscular endurance through "cross-education." This is likely mediated by spinal and supraspinal neural plasticity, suggesting that the "untrained" limb benefits from the neural drive generated by the "trained" limb.
If you have a cast on your left arm, don't stop training your right arm! Research shows that training one side of the body can actually send "signals" to the other side to keep it from losing too much fitness. It’s a great way to "cheat" your way through an injury recovery.
4. Running Economy and the "Spring" Effect
Scientific Perspective: Supplementing aerobic training with resistance work improves running economy (VO₂ at a given submaximal velocity) by increasing musculotendinous stiffness. This allows for better storage and release of elastic energy, reducing the active metabolic cost of each stride or pedal stroke.
Lifting weights makes your tendons and muscles act like high-quality pogo sticks. Instead of your legs "sinking" into the ground with every step, you "pop" back up more efficiently. This saves oxygen and energy, meaning you can run at the same speed with less effort.
5. The Functional Specificity Advantage
Scientific Perspective: Functional resistance training—utilizing multi-planar movements and stability demands—produces superior strength-endurance transfer in field athletes compared to sagittal-plane, machine-based training. This is due to the closer alignment of the training's mechanical and metabolic demands with the sport’s specific movement constraints.
If you play a sport like hockey or soccer, doing leg presses isn't enough. You need to do exercises that mimic the twists, turns, and balances of your game. "Functional" training hits your stabilizers and prime movers at the same time, making you strong in ways that actually show up on the scoreboard.
6. The Interference Effect Myth
Scientific Perspective: The "interference effect"—where strength training supposedly blunts aerobic adaptations—is largely mitigated when resistance training is performed at moderate intensities (60–75% 1RM) and separated from high-volume endurance sessions. Chronic interference is more a product of overtraining/recovery debt than a physiological impossibility of concurrent adaptation.
You don't have to choose between being "strong" and being "cardio-fit." As long as you aren't trying to break powerlifting records on the same day you run 15 miles, the two types of exercise actually help each other. Space your lifting and your running out, and you’ll likely see better results in both.
Your Next Step: A Simple 4-Week Entry Plan
Ready to implement concurrent training? Here is a beginner-friendly, evidence-informed weekly structure designed to improve muscular endurance, strength, recovery capacity, and cardiovascular fitness without excessive training volume.
Monday — Lower-Body Strength + Easy Cardio
Perform lower-body resistance training first:
Romanian deadlifts — 3 × 12 repetitions at ~65% 1RM
Bulgarian split squats — 3 × 12 repetitions
Glute bridges — 3 × 12 repetitions
Follow with:
30-minute easy-paced run or brisk walk
Goal:
Build functional lower-body strength while improving aerobic recovery capacity
Tuesday — Moderate Endurance Training
Choose one:
45-minute aerobic run
Moderate cycling session
Swimming at conversational pace
Maintain an intensity where speaking full sentences remains comfortable
Goal:
Improve cardiovascular endurance and mitochondrial efficiency
Wednesday — Upper-Body Strength + Core Stability
Push-ups — 3 × 15 repetitions
Dumbbell rows — 3 × 15 repetitions
Planks — 3 rounds of 30–60 seconds
Optional:
Shoulder mobility drills
Resistance-band work
Goal:
Improve upper-body endurance, posture, and trunk stability
Thursday — Active Recovery or Mobility Day
20–30-minute relaxed walk
Gentle yoga or stretching session
Foam rolling or mobility exercises
Focus on:
Sleep quality
Hydration
Stress reduction
Goal:
Promote nervous system recovery and reduce cumulative fatigue
Friday — Functional Lower-Body Endurance
Lateral lunges — 3 × 20 repetitions
Step-ups — 3 × 20 repetitions
Cable pull-throughs or resistance-band hip hinges — 3 × 20 repetitions
Use lighter loads (~50% 1RM) with controlled movement quality
Goal:
Improve muscular endurance, joint stability, and movement efficiency
Saturday — Longer Endurance Session
60–90-minute:
Run
Cycling session
Swim
Fast-paced hike
Maintain steady aerobic intensity
Goal:
Build endurance capacity and fatigue resistance
Sunday — Full Rest and Recovery
Prioritise:
High-quality sleep
Protein intake
Hydration
Relaxation and recovery
Avoid intense exercise
Goal:
Allow muscular and neurological supercompensation
.
Author’s Note: A Clinician’s Perspective
As a physician in internal medicine, one of the most consistent patterns I see in clinical practice is that many people still think of exercise in extremes. Patients often tell me they are “doing cardio for health” or “lifting weights for strength,” as though these are completely separate goals. Modern physiology tells a very different story.
The human body does not function in isolated systems. The cardiovascular system, skeletal muscle, nervous system, endocrine signaling pathways, and metabolic machinery constantly communicate with one another. When we improve muscular strength, we often improve insulin sensitivity, mitochondrial efficiency, bone density, balance, and long-term functional independence. When we improve endurance capacity, we enhance cardiovascular resilience, recovery efficiency, vascular health, and fatigue resistance. The science now clearly shows that combining these adaptations produces benefits that are greater than either approach alone.
Clinically, this matters far beyond athletic performance. Loss of muscle mass and declining aerobic capacity are among the strongest predictors of frailty, metabolic disease, falls, disability, and reduced quality of life as we age. Resistance training is no longer simply about aesthetics or athleticism; it is increasingly recognized as a form of preventive medicine. Likewise, endurance exercise is not merely “calorie burning” — it is a powerful regulator of metabolic and cardiovascular health.
Perhaps most importantly, this research reinforces a principle I discuss frequently with patients: recovery is part of training, not the absence of it. Sleep, deload periods, nutrition, and nervous system recovery are biologically essential for adaptation. More exercise is not always better; smarter and more sustainable exercise is.
Medical Disclaimer
The information in this article, including the research findings, is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Before starting a resistance exercise program, you must consult with a qualified healthcare professional, especially if you have existing health conditions (such as cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled hypertension, or advanced metabolic disease). Exercise carries inherent risks, and you assume full responsibility for your actions. This article does not establish a doctor-patient relationship.
Related Articles
How to Build a Disease-Proof Body: Master Calories, Exercise & Longevity | DR T S DIDWAL
How to Maximize Muscle Growth: Evidence-Based Strength Training Strategies | DR T S DIDWAL
References
Feng, Z., Ying, W., & Jun, W. (2026). The effects, mechanisms, and influencing factors of concurrent strength and endurance training with different sequences: A semi-systematic review. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 7, Article 1692399. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1692399
Gürkan, A. C., Eraslan, M., Aydın, S., Altuğ, T., Türkmen, M., Söyler, M., Mülhim, M. A., Şahin, M., Karataş, B., Akcan, İ. O., & Küçük, H. (2025). Muscular strength and endurance adaptations to functional resistance training in young elite field hockey players. Frontiers in Physiology, 16, Article 1536885. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1536885
Hammert, W. B., Yamada, Y., Kataoka, R., Song, J. S., Spitz, R. W., Wong, V., Seffrin, A., & Loenneke, J. P. (2025). Changes in absolute and relative muscular endurance after resistance training: A review of the literature with considerations for future research. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 39(4), 474–491. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005084
Nuzzo, J. L., Taylor, J. L., & Latella, C. (2026). Muscle strength, muscle endurance, voluntary activation, and perception of effort in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): An overview. Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior, 14(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/21641846.2025.2556941
Pancar, Z., Ilhan, M. T., Darendeli, M. K., et al. (2026). Effects of deload periods in resistance training on muscle hypertrophy and strength endurance in untrained young men using a randomized within-subject design. Scientific Reports, 16, Article 10299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40612-5
Ramos-Campo, D. J., Andreu-Caravaca, L., Clemente-Suárez, V. J., & Rubio-Arias, J. Á. (2025). The effect of strength training on endurance performance determinants in middle- and long-distance endurance athletes: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 39(4), 492–506. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005056
Song, J. S., Yamada, Y., Kataoka, R., et al. (2024). Cross-education of muscular endurance: A scoping review. Sports Medicine, 54, 1771–1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02042-z
Zhang, J., Pearson, A. Z., Grunau, M., et al. (2025). The role of muscle mass in endurance performance and neuromuscular fatigue: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 55, 2809–2824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-025-02290-